Tuesday, March 15, 2011

The Eyes of March (2011)


The tradition continues! Below you'll find 11 unedited eye shots, plus the one above. Some of them are very identifiable. Others are nearly impossible. I do this less as a quiz than as a celebration of eye shots, which I find incredibly compelling (even in movies like Red Riding Hood). Still, I've numbered each item so you can provided guesses in the comments section. This is certainly a more difficult batch than in 2010 or 2009. Enjoy!

Monday, March 14, 2011

What Beautiful Eyes She Has: Red Riding Hood


Is it premature to start campaigning for the 2012 Academy Awards? Because if not I’d like to nominate Amanda Seyfried for your consideration for Best Actress for her performance in Red Riding Hood. Oh, I know she can’t win. Her portrayal of the titularly cloaked Valerie has none of the hallmarks of Oscar success. She doesn’t play a historically or culturally significant character. She didn’t transform her shapely figure in deference to her craft or with disregard for her beauty. She delivers no rousing monologue. She adopts no quirky accent. She refrains from dissolving into a puddle of tears. And she doesn’t so much as lay her tongue on the scenery to see if it’s worth chewing. Instead, Seyfried does something all the more remarkable: she delivers a performance that’s unfailingly watchable and convincing within a film that can only be described with those words when she is on screen, and usually not even then. It isn’t the stuff of Oscar, but if you think about it, maybe it should be.

Red Riding Hood is a mess, sometimes in entertaining ways but mostly in befuddling ones. The direction is unproductively busy, the dialogue is awkward and most of the bit parts are so stiffly acted that they could be mistaken for product placement for Viagra. The biggest problem, though, is that the film doesn’t seem to have a clue what it’s about. Written by David Johnson, Red Riding Hood has elements of gothic horror, fairy tale fantasy, tribal fear-of-the-other and even playful farce, but it wears those threads like a tightwad trying on dress shirts at Banana Republic – which is to say not for long and without ultimate investment. Instead the film settles for its Shakespearean-cum-Meyerean romance, not so much because it appears to have any ideas about the genre but because the Twilight books and films have proven there’s a market for that stuff. Better films weave together multiple genres seamlessly; Red Riding Hood bounces around like an actor struggling to find its motivation. In short spans, the film is almost Lynchian, although without the mindfucking boldness or twisted symbolism. Some of the earliest printed versions of Little Red Riding Hood, dating back more than 400 years, are thought to be cautionary tales about a woman’s coming of age – the red cloak representing menstruation and the wolf’s ultimate triumph emphasizing the danger of trust and lost innocence, but there’s no deeper meaning to this cinematic adaptation. What you see is all that’s there.

Monday, March 7, 2011

The Conversations: Last Tango in Paris


The Conversations is back with a look at Bernardo Bertolucci's much debated Last Tango in Paris. Is it an "erotic" film? Was Pauline Kael's orgasmic rave overblown? What motivates these characters? What is Brando doing? What was Bertolucci trying to say with this film? These are some of the questions that Ed Howard and I attempt to answer. But what do you think? Head on over to The House Next Door and join in the conversation!